Conza

Chief sources:

• The Economics and Ethics of Private Property, Hans-Hermann Hoppe

• Chapter 11 - From the Economics of Laissez Faire to the Ethics of Libertarianism (II. p311) (Argumentation and Self-Ownership | Mises Daily) A brief excerpt.
  
• Chapter 13 - On the Ultimate Justification of the Ethics of Private Property (p350) 
• Appendix - Four Critical Replies (p410)

Blogs

• Argumentation Ethics and Liberty: A Concise Guide, Stephan Kinsella
• Revisiting Argumentation Ethics by Stephan Kinsella
• Revisiting Argumentation Ethics, Again by Jeffrey Tucker
• Argumentation Ethics: some brief notes on the concept by Juan Fernando Carpio
• Mises and Argumentation Ethics by Stephan Kinsella
• Hülsmann on Argumentation Ethics by Stephan Kinsella
• Quotes on the Logic of Liberty by Stephan Kinsella
• Van Dun on Argumentation Ethics by Lew Rockwell

Commentary:

• Hoppephobia by Murray N. Rothbard
• Beyond Is and Ought by Murray N. Rothbard
• Liberty Symposium
• New Rationalist Directions in Libertarian Rights Theory, 12:2 Journal of Libertarian Studies: 313-26 (Fall 1996), by Stephan Kinsella
• Defending Argumentation Ethics: Reply to Murphy & Callahan, Anti-state.com (Sept. 19, 2002), by Stephan Kinsella
• The a priori foundations of property economics by Jorg Guido Hulsmann
• Praxeology, Economics and Law: Issues and Implications by Larry J. Sechrest
• Walter Block, Review of Hans-Hermann Hoppe, The Economics and Ethics of Private Property (Kluwer, 1993), Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, vol. 7, num 1, Mars. 1996, pp. 161-165
• Forum Discussion: Estoppel - Argumentation Ethics - Aggression

More.

AE only serves as a negative critique of justifiable norms. It bounds the scope of norms that can be consistently justified without pain of contradiction.

“Here the praxeological proof of libertarianism has the advantage of offering a completely value-free justification of private property. It remains entirely in the realm of is-statements and never tries to derive an “ought” from an “is.” ~ Economics and Ethics of Private Property, p345.

“My entire argument, then, claims to be an impossibility proof. But not, as the mentioned critics seem to think, a proof that means to show the impossibility of certain empirical events, so that it could be refuted by empirical evidence [such as the existence of non-libertarian societies-RPM and GC]. Instead, it is a proof that it is impossible to justify non-libertarian property principles without falling into contradictions…empirical evidence has absolutely no bearing on it.” (Hoppe 1988, p. 53)

A place holder for easy access to the sources on AE. Feel free to discuss it’s merits, while you engage in argumentation ;)