The Lomasky review is an interesting example of what is getting to be a fairly common phenomenon: Hoppephobia. Although he is an amiable man personally, Hoppe’s written work seems to have the remarkable capacity to send some readers up the wall, blood pressure soaring, muttering and chewing the carpet. It is not impolite attacks on critics that does it. Perhaps the answer is Hoppe’s logical and deductive mode of thought and writing, demonstrating the truth of his propositions and showing that those who differ are often trapped in self-contradiction and self-refutation.
In the good old days, this was a common style in philosophy, employed by Kantians, Thomists, Misesians, and Randians alike. In the modern age, however, this method of thought and writing has gone severely out of fashion in philosophy, where truth is almost never arrived at – and certainly never argued for in a deductive fashion. The modern mode is utilitarian, positivist, tangential, puzzle-oriented, and pseudo-empiricist. As a result, modern positivist types have gone flabby and complacent, and reading hard-core deductivists – to say nothing of hard-core libertarians! – hits these people with the force of a blow to the gut.
Well, shape up, guys! In argument as in politics, those who can’t stand deductivist heat should get out of the philosophic or economic kitchen.
- arkkon likes this
- live-exist-die reblogged this from sugashane
- wittiestcom likes this
- e-temen-an-ki likes this
- fearandl0athing likes this
- thegatsandpartyhats likes this
- moralanarchism reblogged this from conza
- anarchei likes this
- boss-of-the-plains reblogged this from sugashane
- sugashane reblogged this from conza
- iambinarymind reblogged this from conza
- iambinarymind likes this
- moralanarchism likes this
- freexcitizen likes this
- blistexfan reblogged this from conza
- blistexfan likes this
- conza posted this