Text
To the monopolists…
How can the state say it protects property, when it must violate property to exist?
-
sheldonwritesanotherblog liked this
-
together12up liked this
-
anthonyhowls liked this
-
whakahekeheke liked this
-
booksofthought liked this
-
mashkwi answered:
it protects “their” property.
-
iambinarymind liked this
-
iambinarymind reblogged this from conza
-
makeitlemonade answered:
Since I usually kick ass at Monopoly I’m qualified to answer—You need to protect the property you’ve stolen or forced others to give up. :p
-
prettycoolblackguy liked this
-
grumpynews reblogged this from conza
-
grumpyjones liked this
-
basedgodtrilla liked this
-
young-anarchist answered:
ugh. People are cunts. Fuck the state. Let’s all just have a giant revolution to get this shit over with. D:
-
logicallypositive answered:
Property is an ancillary effect of the state. You need an enforcement apparatus in order maintain property
-
racetobitchmountain liked this
-
conza posted this
